Good thoughts. I'm going to side with the dealership on this one. The diagnosis was run by the guy in charge of the service dept. We came by five years ago with our 2015 570 which wouldn't re-start when hot, but did start after a half hour. After a few of his guys looked at it and shook their heads, he says "I have an idea". He traced the fuel overflow tube to a pinched spot at the front of the frame, and nailed it. Re-flashing the ECU was the first thing tried before involvement from factory. I'm under the impression that turnover rate is high among service techs.
Back to understanding the issue recently solved. Because the folks in the forum here, the dealership, and I have invested so much time into this, I still want to get to the bottom of it all. I'm tenacious. I have my old expensive 2015 570 manual, popped off the seat of these 2020 570's, and verified that the new throttle bodies are very similar to the ones in my manual. Please critique:
Throttle body: there's the rider-controlled throttle cable coming in on the left, and TPS/IAC sensors on the right. The TPS ("Throttle Position Sensor") measures the throttle plate position selected by the rider's thumb. This is one signal sent to the ECU. The IAC ("Air Idle Control") sort-of-bypasses the TPS to control idle at cold (start up) and after warm-up. The TMAP (mounted between throttle body and engine intake) senses the passing of air and manifold pressure. I have the advantage of comparing our two identical new 570's, and it looks like the TMAP sensor was never messed with during the entire diagnosis process. Same dust in same spots.
The ECU receives (among other inputs): crankshaft position, engine speed, throttle position (from TPS), coolant temperature (same on both machines), air intake temperature (from IAC?), air flow (from TMAP), intake manifold absolute pressure (from TMAP), and battery voltage. This data is mapped to some constants in the ECU, and the output is fuel injector action.
My goal is to have an intelligent conversation with the original factory guy who led the effort and see if I can understand why, after recommending separate swaps of throttle body and ECU, why at the end would recommend going back and swapping both as a pair. At this juncture, I wouldn't be surprised if there are enough differences in throttle body production variances that perhaps there's a constant mapped into the ECU that matches ECU to two or three different performance aspects of throttle bodies. When reflashing, this constant would be left alone.
Where did you get your OTB diagnostic tool, and if you could share, the cost?
Greg