Polaris ATV Forum banner

No difference between 570 sportsman and 1000xp?

22K views 39 replies 14 participants last post by  dslanec  
#1 ·
Hello guys. I’ve been looking for an polaris to fit my height-weight. And i checked 570 sportsman and 1000xp’s dimensions , then realized they were almost the same. It goes like this;

Polaris 570 sportsman
2108 x 1219 x 1219

Polaris sportsman 1000cc
2114 x 1209 x 1289

I have questions about these,
I’m 5’’9 and 105 pounds. (Woman), so i dont actually need the most powerful engine and i dont think i can be able to use it anyways. Im just wondering that, if 570cc and 1000cc’s are the same looking vehicles, why are there huge price differences? Just the torque, performance? If cc only means the “engine size” im gonna go for the 570 . But if these dimensions are facts and they are actually looking the same, im not going to consider cc’s and buy the 570. shouldnt 1000cc be bigger? And why are they literally the same? Thanks!
 
#2 ·
 
#3 ·
 
#5 · (Edited)
The non SP 570 Touring with power steering is by far the best value on the market, as well as the most durable and reliable. As for ride quality, there are two opposing views here. I think the non SP with the strut front suspension is the more comfortable ride. I also don't ride wide open throttle and try to jump everything on the trail. If the ability to go 70 mph is what you're looking for, and price doesn't matter, then the 1000 would be the way to go. For normal trail riding it's tough to beat the 570. Both are good choices, just depends on what you want to do with it, and how much you want to spend.
You are correct. CC (cubic centimeters) is the engine size.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cariboo
#6 ·
This made it clear. So cc’s and dimensions are different things.. Hp, torque, or speed is not that important for me because it’ll be my first atv, im trying to get used to it. I dont need a 1k in this situation but my heart goes for it like everyone’s does. And of course dont wanna look little on a 570cc.. If they’re both looking the same, 570’s price and performance is enough for me. What do you think? Thank you for the comment!
 
#7 ·
You will want to sit on them to verify that they are comfortable. While the overall dimensions of these machines are basically the same, the ergonomics and seat height/design are different between the two.
 
#10 ·
Being your 1st quad, and only weighing 105lbs I think the 570 would better suit you for 1st quad. I'm thinking you need to get with a dealer and see them in person.
 
#11 ·
These quads are all basically the same size, though like previously mentioned the ergonomics are slightly different. The 1000 is a lot of machine for your first atv to be honest. I have been riding for years and have honestly never found a situation where that much power was needed (no mud in AZ). That being said, I actually opted for the 450 (500cc) with eps just because of the price and drivability. I know my wife will get on it and the more power it has, the more likely of an incident. So far the 450 has been more than enough power to climb and suspension is super comfortable.


good luck with whatever you choose
 
#12 ·
Because with the new body style the 1k (and 850) has it puts it close to the old body style (570) but its a lot more machine and a lot nicer machine. I own both I would know LOL. Side by side in my shop the 1K actually looks like it is a tad smaller. Not sure I'd recommend a 1K for a newer rider, it could ruin your day in a hurry with all the power.
 
#14 ·
Fuse,

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but with the new 3 stage throttle on the 1k, doesn't that make the 1k more friendly to a novice rider than it would have been had it has the traditional mechanical throttle?

Lets face it, even the 570 can be a lot of machine for a novice rider in the right situation. Especially when considering the physical size of the novice rider in question. but for some reason Polaris refuses to keep a midsize machine in the lineup.


Myers,

to be clear, based on physical dimensions. All sportsman ATV currently offered by Polaris have the same width, and relatively the same length and wheel base within their classes (1up vs 2up) with the Exception of the Big boss 6x6 for obvious reasons.

They are all nominally 48" wide, and 83" long for a single seater, and 86" long for the Touring (2up) models. The X2 is 89" but that extra 3" is just in the dump bed, it's not in the wheel base.

From 2006-2010, Polaris offered a Midsize Hawkeye/Sportsman 4x4 ATV that is 42" wide and 72" long. (they also weight about 200lbs less than the full size machines) If you can find one that is a 400 you'd probably be in the golden zone for you size, weight, and experience level, but even the 300 can be a lot of fun and is very capable. unfortunately, because Polaris didn't market these machines properly, they have become the redheaded step children of the Polaris line.

To get into a new Polaris, you're stuck with a full size machine. which are substantially larger than most sports quads in both physical dimensions and weight. This just means that it will take a large amount of effort on your part to control them. not un-surmountable but something to be aware of. Because of this I definitely recommend getting an EPS model as it will definitely allow you to stay on the trail longer with less fatigue.
 
#15 ·
^Good point thorshammer, I suppose one could put it in work mode if he/she were a newbie...it dramatically reduces the 1k's performance....you get silky smooth takeoffs and a more manageable powerband. Maybe once they got used to it then switch to standard mode...used to that then go all out in performance mode.
 
#16 ·
bobx2,

If you keep teasing all of us with them awesum pictures of Colorado riding........ you better start lining up a rally for Polaris ATV Forum members to attend!!
 
#18 ·
Actually those are shots from Moab, but a forum members ride would be fun. I know the Polaris RZR Forum does an annual ride up at Taylor Park, CO. They get a huge turnout, and even Polaris brings out a couple of trucks of new machines that people can test.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Waters47
#22 ·
My Midsize Hawkeye 300 has made it up every hill I've pointed it at with the exception of one poorly judged dune where it sank in the soft sand. It's had a couple sketchy moments where I needed a lot of weight forward over the handlebars, but it made it and didn't need more than it's poultry 17 hp to do so. I've got 0 doubt that a 570, regardless of the wheelbase would have plenty of power to make a climb. but I will agree that the longer wheel base of a 2 up model is definitely more stable on hill climbs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cariboo and bobx2
#23 ·
It would seem that some have forgotten that the OP is a female, so she doesn't have the issue of raging testosterone making her think she has to have to biggest, most powerful machine on the trails or else she is somehow less of a rider. :rotflmao: 105 lbs on a 570 compared to 200+ lbs on your big bores. You boys better watch out... :wink
 
  • Like
Reactions: cariboo
#25 ·
They also seem to be forgetting that she's a novice rider, and has made no statements about needing to ride up walls or through feet of snow.
 
#27 ·
Okay, did some house keeping here. We were drifting pretty far off the OP's original topic.
 
#30 ·
Hello guys. I’ve been looking for an polaris to fit my height-weight. And i checked 570 sportsman and 1000xp’s dimensions , then realized they were almost the same. It goes like this;

Polaris 570 sportsman
2108 x 1219 x 1219

Polaris sportsman 1000cc
2114 x 1209 x 1289

I have questions about these,
I’m 5’’9 and 105 pounds. (Woman), so i dont actually need the most powerful engine and i dont think i can be able to use it anyways. Im just wondering that, if 570cc and 1000cc’s are the same looking vehicles, why are there huge price differences? Just the torque, performance? If cc only means the “engine size” im gonna go for the 570 . But if these dimensions are facts and they are actually looking the same, im not going to consider cc’s and buy the 570. shouldnt 1000cc be bigger? And why are they literally the same? Thanks!
I have both. I just bought a LE 1000 so the wife is moving up to the 570 from her 400. Alhough the two machines are basically the same dimensions there is no comparison in power. For all around riding I believe the SP 570 EPS is the best way to go.
Image
Image


Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
If the 570 was the way to go them why did you get a 1000s . Better not let your better half ride it an feel the smoothness and the lack of heat . Also the narrow center that makes easer to side hill.:crying
 
#31 ·
Also keep in mind that the 570 is in the 45HP range , This is the same as the comp's 700-800 units, a little shy of the Polaris 800 which was around the 48-50.

For yourself on the 570 I don't feel you will be disappointed. I have one and it is good for what is was bought to do. Sold a sportsman 700 and a sportsman 800 and it fits right in the middle.
 
#35 ·
Some folks just don't get it ThorsHammer. Even more speak without the experience to back it up. As you well know, I went from my 850 to my 570, and overall prefer my 570. The 850 was great, but the 570 T has been even better. Everything from ride quality to reliability. However, it does no good trying to convince most folks who think the more you spend and the fancier the name, the better the product... :grin
 
  • Like
Reactions: cariboo
#37 ·
I started out on a 02 500 sportsman. Next machine was a 04.5 600. Then a 07 or 08 800. In 09 when the XP came out we got my wife the 550. The new XP was a TOTAL game changer imo. Much easier steering(none power steering model) way thinner mid section, much better handling, the anti kick back front end was for real too. It truly made going on the trails more enjoyable. There was zero comparison in our minds. I sold my 800 and got a 10 850 because I was so impressed with the wife’s machine. In 2012 we had to sell both quads as we started a business. This past fall we were able to get new quads. There was a 0% chance we would own anything but XP models. I got the 1k and the wife the 850. She really had no need for a 850 but there is no longer the 550 model and she would only own a XP model.
So I have plenty of experience on the strut front end machines compared to the XP chassis and I can’t imagine anyone preferring the strut version. Clearly this is just our opinion and everyone has there own idea of what they prefer.
 
#38 ·
Dslanec,

why not go with the 570 SP for your wife, as it would have everything but the narrower seat? I get it if she's of smaller stature. Just wondering.
 
#40 ·
The biggest issue is she is 5’1” and hates the wide stance of the other Polaris’. Her 1st 2 quads were Kawasaki. But they beat the crap out of you on the trails. Very torquey engines but horrible ride. That’s why she didn’t get a Polaris till the XP chassis came out. And the 570sp is the exact same chassis as the non sp but it just has different front suspension. To us the geometry/useability/feel is much greater on the xp chassis as a total package. More then just saying they both (sp & xp) have dual a arm front suspension. Plus the damn sp model is close to 9 grand! For $1500 price difference the 850sp is a much better buy for us all things considered
 
  • Like
Reactions: Battle_Design